NASW NEWS
From the Director
Social Work
Pride Improves Image
By Elizabeth J. Clark, Ph.D.,
ACSW, MPH
NASW
just completed another successful Social Work Month campaign.
Governors, legislators and other elected officials issued
proclamations about the importance of the profession. At
the Social Work Gala honoring child welfare workers, the
six social workers who are federal legislators — Sen. Barbara
A. Mikulski (D-Md.), Sen. Deborah Ann Stabenow (D-Mich.),
Rep. Susan Davis (D-Calif.), Rep. Barbara Lee (D- Calif.),
Rep. Ciro D. Rodriguez (D-Texas) and Rep. Edolphus “Ed” Towns
(D-N.Y.) — sent a combined letter that underscored how
critical professional social work services are in meeting
the needs of vulnerable populations.
Newspapers across the country
ran articles about Social Work Month. Examples of the headlines
are “Social Workers Deserve Recognition”; “Social Workers
Make a Difference”; “Social Workers Provide Opportunities,
Goals”; “Social Workers in Schools Combat Dropout Rate”; “Social
Workers Advocate for Improved Health Care Coverage.” And “The
Power of Social Work.”
Since Social Work Month was
formally established in 1984, we have seen increased media
attention about social work each year. What most of our
members don’t realize is that social workers are mentioned
frequently in the national media. The Public Affairs Office
at NASW receives hundreds of media clippings each month;
over 80 percent of these are positive. Not infrequently,
the negative clips identify someone as a social worker,
but on closer inspection, the individual mentioned has
no social work degree nor any professional training in
social work.
This misunderstanding underscores
several things. First is the need for education of the
public and the media about what social workers do and what
education, training and licenses are required to be professional
social workers. Many state licensing laws do not include
title protection for social workers. In these states, anyone
can self-identify as a “social worker”; they just can’t
call themselves licensed social workers.
In fact, during the 2000 Census,
845,000 individuals self-identified as social workers.
This number stands in contrast to the approximately 600,000
persons holding social work degrees who are practicing
today. That leaves over a quarter of a million people who
want to align with our profession. We all need to encourage
these individuals to acquire the education and skills necessary
to become professional social workers.
What the Census can’t tell us
is how many professional social workers did not list social
work as their profession. While no hard data exist, there
appears to be a disturbing trend. The more educated and
credentialed the social workers, the less likely they are
to identify their professional title as “social worker.” Instead,
they list “psychotherapist,” “professor,” “researcher,” “administrator,” “community
organizer” or “legislative aide.” They may be case managers,
marriage and family therapists, directors of foundations
or agencies, or attorneys. The list could go on and on.
While it may be less appropriate
to use the title “social worker” in some work settings,
it almost always is acceptable to use your MSW or other
social work degree or credential on a business card or
after your signature. When an individual uses only “Ph.D.” as
the identifying credential, others don’t know the specialty
area. But if the business card includes “MSW” as well as “Ph.D.,” it
tells the public that this is a person with social work
training. More important, it signifies pride in being a
social worker.
If you finish a joint program
such as an MPH/MSW or a J.D./MSW program, why not list
both degrees, even if your work title is officially “public
health specialist” or “attorney”?
Every time the public learns
that a therapist or case manager or legislator or administrator
or other expert is a social worker, that positively advances
social work’s image. Every time you write a letter to a
newspaper, to a politician or to any public group and identify
yourself as a social worker, you help others understand
social work activism and the profession’s legacy for speaking
out against injustice.
At Social Work Summit II last
December, participants from 42 social work organizations
identified the need for a public awareness campaign about
the profession of social work. This will need to be a collaborative
undertaking and will require significant funding. NASW
is beginning the planning for such a campaign. But it will
take each and every one of us working together to expand
the value and image of social work.
To comment to Elizabeth J.
Clark: NewsColumn@naswdc.org
|